Hydrus’s-1D capability for assessment of soils water regime

Authors

  • Y. Dmytruk Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • V. Zakharovskyi Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/acss89-02

Keywords:

Haplic Luvisol; Hydrus-1D; Luvic Chernozem; model; simulation; soil texture

Abstract

Many areas of the world already have water shortages, and climate change could make this problem worse. Water regime is one of the components of soil system and it is very important for agriculture during nowadays climate change. Due to soil moisture nutrients become available for plants, chemical elements can migrate as radial, as lateral directions. Different soils have immanent features in the movement of water, so and movement of all dissolved in water elements. The aim of this research is comparative assessment of water dynamic between different two soils types located in similar climate conditions. These soils are characterized own texture because of features their genesis, first parent materials. For the simulation of water regime, we used well-known program Hydrus-1D. For it, we were compared next parameters: pressure head, water content, hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic capacity between Haplic Luvisol and Luvic Chernozem. On base of soil texture, we calculated some parameters becoming from modelling. These soil parameters assessed in fifth times: 0th, 15th, 30th, 45th, and 60th days. Thus, during of observation time these parameters were showing significant differences between Haplic Luvisol and Luvic Chernozem, despite the similar soil forming factors. The main difference is, first, their profile distribution, and then their quantitative values of parameters. Considering the location of the studied soils on Agroecosystems, the obtained data are important for the practical use of agro-technologies. Using of Hydrus-1D, we can also predict the soils contamination. Soil leaching processes is significantly relationship with vertical transport of water. This poses a risk both the loss of the nutrients from the soil and the contamination of the groundwater [1]. Therefore, the quality of the last is closely linked to the ability of soils to infiltrate water. Significant results of our researching indicate achieved in the simulation during the first 30 days. Therefore, for modelling it is advisable to choose periods of control over parameters of the Water regime in 5-10-20-30 days. Compared to Haplic Luvisol Luvic Chernozem have optimal indices of its texture, that provide better parameters of water regime, which is due to the higher content of fine particles. Illuvial clay of Haplic Luvisol, because of elluvial-illuvial processes, has an indicated effect on the vertical distribution such a parameter of the water regime as water content and less influence on the hydraulic capacity. When included in the simulation the real amount of precipitation during the observation, data on the corresponding changes for hydraulic conductivity and less for water pressure were obtained. It is likely that the more displayed effect of rain on day 45th than in other periods maybe explained by the nature of the precipitation (downpour rather than prolonged rain).

References

References

Tsapko Y., Desyatnik K., Dmytruk Y. 2014. Assessment of changes of some functions of Ukrainian acid soils after chemical amelioration. Soil Science Annual. Vol. 65. (3). P. 111-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ssa-2015-0002.

Global climate Report – Annual, 2019. URL: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201913

FAO’s work on climate change. United Nations Climate Change Conference. 2019. URL: http://www.fao.org/3/ca7126en/CA7126EN.pdf.

Šimunek J., Šejna M., Saito H., Sakai M., Van Genuchten M.Th. 2009. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media, version 4.08. Department of Environmental Sciences. University of California. HYDRUS Software Series 3. Riverside. 330 p. URL: https://www.pc-progress.com/Downloads/Pgm_hydrus1D/HYDRUS1D-4.08.pdf.

Šimunek J., Van Genuchten M.Th., Šejna M. 2012. HYDRUS: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE. American society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 55(4). P. 1263-1274. DOI: https://doi.org /10.13031/2013.42239.

Chen M., Willgoose G., Saco P. 2014. Spatial prediction of temporal soil moisture dynamics using HYDRUS-1D. Hydrological Processes. Vol. 28(2). P. 171-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9518.

Porn L., Yan B., Soun S., Ouk S. 2019. Effects of Loess Cavity on Soil Moisture Movement: Revealed by Soil Column and HYDRUS Model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. Vol. 11(04). P. 371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.114022.

Wang X., Li Y., Wang Y., Liu C. 2018. Performance of HYDRUS-1D for simulating water movement in water-repellent soils. Canadian journal of soil science. Vol. 98(3). P. 407-420. DOI: https://doi.org /10.1139/CJSS-2017-0116.

Minasny B., McBratney A. 2018. Limited effect of organic matter on soil available water capacity. European journal of soil science. Vol. 69(1). P. 39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12475.

Wu Y., Yang A., Zhao Y [et al.]. 2019. Simulation of soil water movement under biochar application based on the Hydrus-1D the black soil region of China. Applied ecology and environmental research. 2019. Vol. 17(2). P. 4183-4192. DOI: https://doi.org /10.15666/aeer/1702_41834192.

DSTU 4287:2004 Soil quality. Sampling (with abolition in Ukraine GOST 28168-89). (Ukr.).

DSTU 4730:2007 Soil quality. The soil granulometric composition analysis by pipette method in modification of N.A.Kachynskyi. [Existing from 2008-10-01]. Кyiv: State Committee of Ukraine for Technical Regulation and Consumer Policy. 2008. 18 p. (Ukr.).

Kühn P., Aguilar J., Miedema R., Bronnikova M. 2018. Textural pedofeatures and related horizons. Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths (Second Edition). P. 377-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53156-8.00011-8.

Helevera O., Topolnyi F. 2018. Towards origin of podzolized and nonpodzolized acid soils. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. Vol. 8(1). P. 516-526. DOI: https://doi.org /10.15421/2018_244. (Ukr.).

Jačka L., Pavlásek J., Kovář M. 2018. The effect of the layer interface on the distribution of infiltrated water in the profile of mountain podzol. In 20th EGU General Assembly, EGU2018, Procedings from the conference held 4-13 April 2018 in Vienna Austria. Vol. 20. P. 13767. URL: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018EGUGA.2013767J/abstract.

Balasubramanian A. 2017. Soil Forming Processes. Technical Report. University of Mysore. 10 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34636.00644.

Génin J.M., Aïssa R., Gehin A., Abbelmoula M., Benali O., Ernstsen V., Ona-Nguena G., Upadhyay C., Ruby C. 2005. Fougerite and FeII-III hydroxycarbonate green rust; Ordering, deprotonation and/or cation substitution; Structure of hydrotalcite-like compounds and mythic ferrosichydroxide Fe(OH)(2+x). Solid State Sciences. Vol. 7 P. 545-572. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2005.02.001.

Mouhamad R., Atiyah A., Mohammad R., Iqbal M. 2015. Decomposition of organic matter under different soil textures. Current Science. Vol. 1(1). P. 22-25. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 277775445_Decomposition_of_organic_matter_under_different_soil_textures.

Wang J., Huang Y., Long H. 2016. Water and salt movement in different soil textures under various negative irrigating pressures. Journal of integrative agriculture. Vol. 15(8). P. 1874-1882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61209-6.

Belolipskyi V.O., Druhova O.P., Druhov O.N. 2019. Analysis of the soil hydrological function of steppe agrolandscapes: mathematical models of migration processes. Agrochemistry and Soil Science. Collected papers. No.88. NSC ISSAR. Kharkiv. P.12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/acss88-02.

Van Genuchten M.Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils 1. Soil science society of America journal. Vol. 44(5) P. 892-898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.

Hornberger G., Wiberg P., Raffensperger J., D’Odorico P. 2014. Elements of physical hydrology. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. 377 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1468014

Downloads

Published

2020-06-01

How to Cite

Dmytruk, Y., & Zakharovskyi, V. (2020). Hydrus’s-1D capability for assessment of soils water regime. AgroChemistry and Soil Science, 89, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31073/acss89-02