Methodological approaches to modeling the K factor of the RUSLE soil losses model from erosion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31073/acss100-03Keywords:
soil, erosion, model, statistics, factorAbstract
The article discusses methodological approaches to modeling the soil erosion factor K, which is part of the RUSLE model, taking into account the spatial variability of its main subfactors – particle size distribution and macrostructural composition, soil organic carbon content and soil permeability. The aim of this study is to establish spatial patterns of particle size distribution and organic carbon content within slope landscapes and to substantiate approaches to their mathematical description. The study was conducted using field and laboratory data, geoinformation analysis, correlation, and regression methods. Statistically significant relationships were established between the topographic factor LS and key subfactors of the K factor. In particular, inverse relationships were identified between relief intensity and indicators characterizing soil mass accumulation. These relationships were shown to be predominantly nonlinear, leading to the limitations of linear models and the advisability of using power functions, which provide higher approximation accuracy (R² > 0.7). Further verification of the results was performed using the soil magnetic susceptibility index as an integrated indicator of its properties. The results confirm the threshold (intermittent) nature of accumulation processes within sloping lands and demonstrate the feasibility of effectively predicting the spatial distribution of the K factor based on topographic and soil parameters. The proposed approach can be used to improve the accuracy of erosion risk assessments and to justify soil conservation land management measures
References
Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall-erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning (Agriculture Handbook No. 537). Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60600505/RUSLE/AH_537%20
Predicting%20Rainfall%20Soil%20Losses.pdf
Вaliuk, S. A., Timchenko, D. O., Hichka, M. M., Kutsenko, M. V., Burakov, V. I., Gukov, … Zubov, O. R. (2010). Scientific and applied foundations of soil protection against erosion in Ukraine : monograf. Kharkiv: NSC ISSAR named after O. N. Sokolovsky. Retrieved from https://repo.btu.kharkiv.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/212f1ac0-9e77-4186-a9e5-3584ab947aba/content [in Ukrainian].
Morgan, R. P. C. & Kirkby, M. J. & British Geomorphological Research Group. (1980). Soil erosion. Eds. M. J. Kirkby, R. P. C. Morgan. Chichester, [England]; New York: Wiley. Available from https://www.library.gov.au/services/onsite-access/collection-delivery-service#offsite
Minasny, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2016). Digital soil mapping: A brief history and some lessons. Geoderma, 264, 301–311. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.07.017
Hengl, T., de Jesus, J. M., MacMillsn, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ribeiro, E. … Gonzalez, M. R. (2014). SoilGrids1km: Global soil information based on automated mapping. PLOS ONE, 9(8), e105992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105992
Panagos, P., Meusburger, K., Ballabio, C., Borrelli, P., & Alewell, C. (2014). Soil erodibility in Europe: A high-resolution dataset based on LUCAS. Science of the Total Environment, 479–480, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.010
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., Alewell, C., Lugato, E., & Montanarella, L. (2015). Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy, 48, 8–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021
Svitlychnyi, O. O., & Chornyi, S. H. (2007). Osnovy eroziieznavstva [Fundamentals of erosion science]. Sumy, Ukraine: VTD «Universytetska knyha». Retrieved from https://geoknigi.com/book_view.php?id=1471& [in Ukrainian].
Vadyunina, A. F., & Korchagina, Z. A. (1986). Methods for determination of soil physical properties. Moscow: Agropromizdat. Retrieved from http://libarch.nmu.org.ua/handle/GenofondUA/64795 [in Russian].
Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1
Shaqiri M. S., Iljazi T., Kamberi L., Ramani-Halili R. Differences between the correlation coefficients Pearson, Kendall and Spearman. 5th International Conference of Natural Science and Mathematics. Tetovo, 2023. P. 392–397. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375800096_DIFFERENCES_BETWEEN_
Lakin, G. F. (1980). Biometrics: Textbook (3rd ed.). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. Retrieved from http://booksshare.net/index.php?id1=4&category=biol&author=lakin-gf&book=1990 [in Russian].
Kruglov, O. V. (2020). On the issue of correction of soil erosion modeling results. Visnyk KhNAU im. V. V. Dokuchaieva. Seriia: Gruntoznavstvo, ahrokhimiia, zemlerobstvo, lisove hospodarstvo, ekolohiia gruntiv, 1, 65–71. Retrieved from https://repo.btu.kharkiv.ua/handle/123456789/78346 [in Ukrainian].
de Winter, J. C. F., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2016). Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079
Miroshnychenko, M., Kruglov, O., Nazarok, P., & Kovalenko, S. (2021). Identification of the structure of soil cover by magnetic susceptibility. In Y. Dmytruk & D. Dent (Eds.), Soils under stress (pp. 57–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68394-8_6
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (2001). Hillslope evolution by nonlinear, slope-dependent transport: Steady state morphology and equilibrium adjustment timescales. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106(B8), 16499–16513. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000323
Roering, J. J., Hunter, B. D., Ferrier, K. L., Chadwick, O. A., Yoo, K., & Wackett, A. A. (2023). Quantifying erosion rates and weathering pathways that maximize soil organic carbon storage. Biogeochemistry, 164(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01054-7
Kruglov, O., Menshov, O., Horoshkova, L., & Kruhlov, B. (2023). Magnetic susceptibility of inclined soils and its relationship with some agronomic indicators. Plant and Soil Science, 14(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.31548/plant1.2023.39
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.