Impact of continuous cultivation on soil properties of Imo state southeastern Nigeria

Authors

  • C.I. Ernest Department of Soil Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology
  • C.N. Mbah Department of Soil Science and Land Resource Management, Ebonyi State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/acss85-07

Keywords:

Continuous cultivated plots, fallow plots, soil properties, Southeastern Nigeria

Abstract

The study was centred on the impact of continuous cultivation on soil properties of Imo state Southeastern Nigeria. Field study was carried out in six Local Government Areas of Imo State which include Owerri West, Ideato North, Ikeduru, Ngor Okpala, Mbaitoli, Owerri Municipal. 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil samples were collected from a seven year continuous cultivated plots. Soil samples were also collected in fallow plots as a tool for comparison. Soil samples were air dried and sieved for standard laboratory analysis. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results show nutrient depletion in the continuous cultivated plots compared to the fallow plot. Mean pH values recorded in the continuous cultivated plots was 5.27 compared to 6.22 recorded in the fallow plots. High total exchangeable acidity was recorded in the continuous plots (2.06 cmol/kg) compared to fallow plots (0.80 cmolkg). The fallow plots recorded higher mean organic matter content (3.66 %), total nitrogen (0.14 %) total exchangeable bases (3.43 com/kg), effective cation exchange capacity (4.23), percentage base saturation (81.1 %) and available phosphorus (19.69 ppm) compared to the continuous cultivated plots having mean organic matter content (0.72 %), total nitrogen (0.07 %) total exchangeable bases (0.84 com/kg), effective cation exchange capacity (2.90 cmol/kg), percentage base saturation (28.7 %) and available phosphorus (4.58 ppm). Deforestation, intensive cultivation and erosion were observed to have aided the decline of nutrient levels in the continuous cultivated plots. Application of organic manure, crop rotation and incorporation of crop residue would boost the fertility status of these soils.

References

References

Eludoyin, O.S., Wokocha, C.C., 2011. Soil Dynamics under Continous Monocropping of Maize (Zea mays) on a Forest Alfisol in South-Western Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(2): 58-62.

Verma, G., Sharma, R.P., Sharma, S.P., Subehia, S.K, Shambhavi, S., 2012. Changes in soil fertility status of maize-wheat system due to long-term use of chemical fertilizers and amendments in an alfisol. Plant soil environ. 58,(12): 529–533.

Fallahazade, J. Hajabbasi, M.A., 2011. Soil organic matter status changes with Cultivation of overgrazed pastures in semi-dry west central Iran. Int. J.Soil Sci., 6(2): 114-123.

Oguike, P.C., Mbagwu, J.S.C., 2009. Variations in some physical properties and organic matter content of soils of coastal plain sand under different land use types. World J. Agric. Sci., 5(1): 63-69.

Awotoye, O.O., Ogunkunle, C.O., Adeniyi, S.A., 2011. Assessment of soil quality under various land use practices in a humid agro-ecological zone of Nigeria. African Journal of Plant Science Vol. 5(10): 565-569.

Finck, A., 1973. The fertility of tropical soils under the influence of agricultural land use. Appl. Sci. Dev., 1: 7-31.

Lal, R.,1987. Managing the soils of Sub Saharan Africa. Science, 4(236): 1069-1076.

Ofomata, G.E.K., 1975. Nigeria in maps. Eastern States, Ethiope publishing House, Benin city, Nigeria, Pp. 88.

Obihara, C.H., 1961. The acid soils of eastern Nigeria. Part 1: extent Nigerian scientist 1:57-67.

Hendershot, W.H., Lalende, H., Duquette, M., 1993. Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity in sampling and methods of soil sci. Lewis productions,London Pp. 142-145.

Gee, G.N., Or, D., 2002. Particle size analysis. In: Methods of soil analysis. Dan D.I and G.C Topps (Eds), part 4 physical methods. Soil Science Soc. America book series No. 5 ASA and SSA Madison,W.I. Pp. 225-293.

Grossman, R.B., Rernisch, T.G., 2002. SSSA book series. 5 methods of soil analysis Ch2, Ed. Dane J.H, Clarke, Topp.G. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison,Wisconsin, USA.

Walke,y A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the different methods of determining SOM and proposed modification of the chronic acid and titration method. Soil sci. 37: 29-38.

Nelson, D.N., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and matter. In: methods of soil analysis part 2 (Miller, A.D and Keeney, D.K.M). American Society of Agronomy. Pp 539-579.

Olsen, S.R., Sommers, I.E., 1982. Soil available phosphorus. In: Sparks, D.L, Pages, A.L, Hennke, P.A.

Jackson, M.L., 1964. Chemical composition of soil. In: Chemistry of soil, Bean, F.E (Ed) Van Nostrand C.O, New York, Pp. 71-144.

Thomas, G.W., 1988. Exchangeable cations. In .A.I Page (Ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 2nd edition. Agronomy 9: 159-165. 1392.

Bremner, J.R., Yeomans, J.C., 1998. Laboratory techniques in J.R Wilson (Ed) Advance in nitrogen cycling in agriculture ecosystem C.A.B Int. Willing, England.

Mclean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.I et al (Ed). Methods of soil analysis part 2 2nd (Ed) agron. Mono. ASA and SSAA.

Soil Survey Laboratory Staff, 1992. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. USDA- SCS Soil Survey Investigation Report N0 42 Version 2.0 US Govt. Print. Offices Washington DC.

Wilding,L.P., 1994. Soil testing: For improving nutrient recommendation. Madison, WIS, USA. SSSA, ASA. xiiv.

Mbagwu, J.S.C., Lal, R., Scott, T.W., 1983. Physical properties of three soils in southeastern Nigeria. Soil sci., 36: 48-55

Landon, J.R., 1984. Booker tropical manual. A handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. Booker agricultural international Ltd.Uk.

Astera, M., 2008. Cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil minerals and soil testing for organic gardeners.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-09

How to Cite

Ernest , C., & Mbah , C. (2016). Impact of continuous cultivation on soil properties of Imo state southeastern Nigeria. AgroChemistry and Soil Science, 85, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.31073/acss85-07