Connection of spatial variation of chernozem penetration resistance with environmental plant organization structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31073/acss86-09Keywords:
Soil penetration resistance; Morphological features; Environmental factor; Phytoindication; Vegetable ecomorphs; CenomorphsAbstract
The study was carried out to detect the spatial variation of soil in the penetration resistance due to environmental factors. Spatial variability of the chernozem ordinary penetration resistance measured on a regular grid (105 points). For information about environmental measurements the ecomorphic analysis of vegetation in each landfill cell has been made. With the help of geostatistics and cluster analysis, the experimental polygon was divided into areas with the one-typical changes in penetration resistance by profile. The connection of the dynamics of soil the penetration resistance within profile with environmental factors has been revealed. Cluster, discriminant and dispersion analyzes were used for this purpose. Soil ecomorphes have been decribed as elements of the soil structure to be significantly differ in their associated climatic and edaphic properties, as well as on the ecological structure of plant communities.
References
References
Belgard A.L. 1971. Steppe forest science. M.: Forest industry. 336 p. (Rus.).
Nazarenko N.N. 2016. Coenomorphs as phytometers of biotopes. Visn. Dnipropetr. Univ. Ser. Biol. Ecol. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 8-14 (Rus.).
Didukh Ya.P. 2012. Fundamentals of bioindication. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 344 p. (Ukr.).
Tarasov V.V. 2005. Flora of the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions. DNU Publishing house. 276 p. (Ukr.).
Andrusevich E.V. 2013. Zoological method of diagnosing technozems. Natural Technogenic Complexes: Reclamation and Sustainable Operation: Collection of Materials of the International Scientific Conference (June 10-15, 2013) / Ed. V.A. Androkhanov. Novosibirsk. P. 55-57 (Rus.).
Gilyarov M.S. 1982. Soil invertebrates as indicators of the soil regime and its changes under the influence of anthropogenic factors. Bioindication of the state of the environment in Moscow and the Moscow region. M.: Nauka. P. 8-12. (Rus.).
Zhukov A.V. 2003. The soil zoological diagnostics on the basis trophic structure analisis of soil mesofauna in steppe Pre-Dniper region. Ecology and Noospherology. Vol. 13, № 1–2. P. 104–112. (Rus.).
Krivoluckij D.A. 1994. Soil fauna in environmental control. M.: Nauka. 269 р. (Rus.).
Mynkovskii G.M. 1995. A Structured Approach in Soil Science. Pochvovedenie. №7. P. 9-18.
Rozanov B.G. 2004. Morphology of soils.M: Academic project 432 p. (Rus.).
Bondar G.A., Zhukov A.V. 2011. The ecological structure of the vegetation cover formed as a result sod-lithogenic soils on loess like loams self growing. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’kogo derzhavnogo agrarnogo universytetu. № 7. P. 54-62. (Rus.).
Zhukov A.V., Kunah O.N., Konovalova T.P. 2013. Spatial distribution of mole rat (Spalax microphthalmus) mounds and soil penetration resistance. Ecological journal of the Volga region, № 1. P. 3–15 (Rus.).
Medvedev V.V. 2009. Soil penetration resistance. Kharkiv: City printing House. 152 p. (Rus.).
Zhukov А., Zadorozhnaya G. 2016. Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekologia (Bratislava). Vol. 35, № 3. P. 263-278.
Grunwald S., McSweeney K., Rooney D.J., Lowery B. 2001. Soil layer models created with profile cone penetrometer data / Geoderma. 2001. V. 103, № 1–2. P. 181–201.
Cecilia M., Jesus H.C., Cortes С.А. 2012. Soil penetration resistance analysis by multivariate and geostatistical methods. Eng. Agric. Jaboticabal. V. 32, № 1. P. 91–101.
Zadorozhnaya G.A. 2016. Seasonal dynamics of ecomorphic structure of chernozem. Agrochemistry and Soil Science. Collected papers. No. 85. ISSAR. Kharkiv. P.53-60. (Rus.).
Marinšek A., Čarni A., Šilc U., Manthey M. 2015. What makes a plant species specialist in mixed broad-leaved deciduous forests? Plant Ecology. V. 216, № 10. Р. 1469–1479.
Kleshcheva E.A. 2010. Indicator properties of Southern Siberian plants with respect to soil moisture. Russ. J. Ecol. V. 41, № 6. Р. 480–485.
Cambardella C.A. Moorman T.B., Novak J.M. [et al.]. 1994. Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils / Soil Science Soc. Am. Vol. 58. P. 1501–1511.
Boogaart K.Gerald. 2010. Package ‘tensorA’. Advanced tensors arithmetic with named indices. 2010. 48 с. URL: http://www.stat.boogaart.de/tensorA.
Zhukov A.V. 2015. Phytoindicative estimation of measurements obtained with multidimensional scaling of the plant community structure. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University. № 1. Р. 69–93. (Rus).
Lipies J., Hatano H. 2003. Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth. Geoderma. V. 116, № 1–2. P. 107–136.
Hamza M.A., Anderson W.K. 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Till. Res. Vol. 82, № 2. P. 121–145.
Zhukov A.V. Zadorozhnaya G.A. 2015. The role of the horizon-over morphological structures in vegetation organization of the sod-lithogenic soils on loess-like clays (Nikopol manganese ore basin). The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: biology. № 24. Р. 171–186. (Rus.).
Zhukov А.V., Zadorozhnaya G.A. 2015. Pedozem and chernozem ecomorphogenesis assessment by soil penetration resistance data. Agrochemistry and Soil Science. Collected papers. No. 84. ISSAR. Kharkiv. P.72-80. (Rus.).
Zadorozhna G.О. 2016. Environmental aspect of spatially inhomogeneous of technogenic origin edafotops. Scientific Bulletin of Volyn National University named after Lesya Ukrainka. Biological sciences. Vol. 332, № 7. Р. 106-116 (Ukr.).
Dmitriev E.A. 2001. Theoretical and methodological problems of soil science. M.: GEOS. 374 p. (Rus.).
Zaharchenko A.V. Zaharchenko N.V. 2006. Experience of the 3D morphometry of the soil horizons surfaces in fields investigations. Eurasian Soil Sci+. № 2. Р. 153–160. (Rus.).
Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. 2000. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol. 31. P. 343–366.
Peters D.P.C., Herrick, J.E., Urban, D.L. [et al.]. Strategies of ecological extrapolation. Oikos. 2004. Vol. 106. P. 627–636.
Chajkovskii Yu.V. 2008. Active connected world. The experience of the theory of the evolution of life M.: Partnership of scientific publications of KMC. 726 p. (Rus.).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
