Probabilistic nature of humus content and estimation of heterogeneity at mapping of soils on basin principle

Authors

  • V.O. Belolipskyi National Scientific Center “Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N. Sokolovsky”
  • T.M. Laktionova National Scientific Center “Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N. Sokolovsky”
  • M.M. Poluliakh National Scientific Center “Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N. Sokolovsky”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31073/acss86-03

Keywords:

humus content; probability; basin; catchment; Chernozem ordinary; degradation

Abstract

Estimation of the probabilistic nature of humus content, its spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of changes are made on the example of Chernozem ordinary in the system of four watersheds in the river basin of Aidar in Lugansk region of Ukraine. It was used for the calculations humus content for two periods - 1970 and 2011. It was found that the loss of humus content for 41 years is 0.015 and 0.020 % within the limits of Bilolutsky and Starobilsk watersheds and 0.024 and 0.029 % in the watersheds areas of Kuryachivsky and Bakhmutovsky. The stabilization of humus content in the upper part of the basin (4.5 %) and its decrease below the current from 6.13 → 4.79 → 4.10 % (1970) to 4.08 → 4.07 → 3.55 % (2011). As a whole, in the soils of the Aidar River basin since 1970 there was a decrease in the content of humus from 4,58 ± 0,13 % (1970) to 4,03 ± 0,05 % (2011). The statistical analysis of the data was carried out according to the following indicators: number of observations (n); mean value (хmean); dispersion (S2); standard deviation (S); variation coefficient (Cv); absolute error (Sxmean); median (M); asymmetry (A); excess (E). The analysis of the probability of the nature of the humus content is performed according to the following criteria: humus content index ‒ the ratio of actual humus content in the control point to the arithmetic mean; theoretical curve of theoretical probability curve (Pearson type III curve), constructed by arithmetic mean, coefficient of variation (Cv) and coefficient of asymmetry (Cs). It was found that the probability of displaying average (typical) values of humus content on the investigated objects is determined by the system of catchments and does not exceed 50 %. At the same time, in the case of values of the coefficients of variation Cv = 10,5 and 12,1 % (Starobilsk and Belolutsky watersheds, respectively), the deviation of the probabilities from the average content of humus (4.05 and 4.38 %) in the direction of decline does not exceed 40 % of the territorial distribution, and in the case of values Cv = 18.6 and 19.7 %, the probability and deviation from the typical level (3.50 and 4.05 % humus in the Bakhmut and Kuryachiv watersheds) is 60 %. The spatial variability of the humus content in the soils of all four catchments does not exceed the average (CV = 10.47 ‒ 19.65 %). According to the results of the analysis of the spatial distribution of soils by groups of humus content in four catchment areas, an integrated map of humus content in the basins of the Aidar River in general was constructed and the area of soils with different parameters was determined.

References

References

Stockmann U., Padarian J., McBratney A., Minasny B., Brogniez D., Montanarella L., Hong S.Y., Rawlins B.G., Field D.J. 2015. Global soil organic carbon assessment. Global Food Security, 6. P. 9–16.

McBratney A., Field D.J., Koch A. 2014. The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma, 213. P. 203–213.

McBratney A., Stockmann U., Angers D., Minasny B., Field D. 2014. Challenges for soil organic carbon research. In: Hartemink A.E., McSweeney K. (Eds.). Soil Carbon. Progress in Soil Science. Springer International Publishing. P. 3–16.

Hartemink A.E., McSweeney K. 2014. (Eds.). Soil Carbon. Progress in Soil Science. Springer International Publishing. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04084-4.

Rossiter D.G. 2005. Digital soil mapping: Towards a multiple-use Soil Information System. Análisis Geográficos, 32 (1). P. 7–15.

Conant R.T., Paustian K. 2002. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in grasslands: implications for detecting change at different scales. Environmental Pollution, 116. P. 127–135.

Batjes N.H., Dijkshoorn J.A. 1999. Carbon and nitrogen stocks in the soils of the Amazon Region. Geoderma, Vol. 89, Iss. 3-4. Pp. 273–286.

Wang Y., Fu B., Lu Y., Song C., Luan Y. 2010. Local-scale spatial variability of soil organic carbon and its stock in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Quaternary Research, Vol.73, Iss.1. P. 70–76.

Vos C., Don A., Hobley E.,Prietz R., Heidkamp A., Freibauer A. 2017. Drivers for spatial variability in agricultural soil organic carbon stocks in Germany. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 19, EGU2017-4939. © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Batjes N.H., Sombroek W.G. 1997. Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils. Global Change Biology, 3. P. 161–173.

Mishra U., Riley W.J. 2012. Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability and dependence on environmental factors. Biogeosciences, 9, 3637–3645. DOI:10.5194/bg-9-3637-2012.

Kravchenko A.N., Robertson G.P., Snap S.S.,Smucker A.J.M. 2005. Using information about spatial variability to improve estimates of total soil carbon. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 98, No. 3. P. 823–829. DOI:10.2134/agronj2005.0305.

Bameri A., Khormali F., Kiani F., Dehghani A.A. 2012. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon on different slope positions of loess hillslopes in Toshan area, Golestan province. J. of Water and Soil Conservation, Vol. 19 (2). P. 43–61.

Bameri A., Khormali F., Kiani F., Dehghani A.A. 2015. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in different hillslope positions in Toshan area, Colestan province, Iran: geostatistical approaches. Journal of Mountain Science 12(6). DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3213-z.

Tsui C.C., Chen Z.S., Hsieh C.F. 2004. Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of southern Taiwan. Geoderma 123. P. 131–142.

Chuai X.W., Huang X.J., Wang W.J., Liao Q.L. 2012.Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon and Related Factors in Jiangsu Province, China. Pedosphere, Vol. 22, Iss. 3. P. 404–414.

Zhang H, Zhuang S, Qian H, Wang F, Ji H. 2015. Spatial Variability of the Topsoil Organic Carbon in the Moso Bamboo Forests of Southern China in Association with Soil Properties. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0119175. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119175

Martin D., Lal T., Sachdev C.B., Sharma J.P. 2010. Soil organic carbon storage changes with climate change, landform and land use conditions in Garhwal hills of the Indian Himalayan mountains. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 138. P. 64–73.

Wang H.Q., Hall C.A.S., Cornell J.D., Hall M.H.P. 2002. Spatial dependence and the relationship of soil organic carbon and soil moisture in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Landscape Ecol., 17. P. 671–684.

Powers J.S., Schlesinger W.H. 2002. Relationships among soil carbon distributions and biophysical factors at nested spatial scales in rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Geoderma, 109. P. 165–190.

Garten C.T. 2011. Comparison of forest soil carbon dynamics at five sites along a latitudinal gradient. Geoderma 167–168. P. 30–40.

Mulla D.J., McBratney A.B. 2000. Soil spatial variability.In: Handbook of soil science, edited by: Sumner M.E., CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. A321–A352.

Parton W.J., Schimel D.S., Cole C.V., Ojima D.S. 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51 (5). P. 1173–1179.

Ryzhova I.M., Podvezennaya M.A. 2008. Spatial variability of the organic carbon pool in soils of forest and steppe biogeocenoses. EurasianSoilScience, V. 41, Iss. 12. Pp. 1260–1267. DOI:10.1134/S106422930812003X.

Horbachova A.E., Plotnikova T.V. 1974. Regularities of humus content distribution in chernozem southern of Donbas. Pochvovedenie, N 8, Pp. 41-48/ (Rus.).

Plotnikov T.V., Druhov O.N. 1969. Soils of Luhansk region. Luhansk: Donbas. 68 p. (Ukr.).

National Atlas of Ukraine. 2007. Kyiv: DNVP “Kartografia”. 440 p. (Ukr.).

Atlas of the maps of Ukrainian soil properties [Electronic resource]. 2007. Kharkiv. Elect.optical disk (CD -ROM): colour; 12 cm. System requirement: Pentium; Windows.Title Ukr.: Elektronnyi Atlas kart vlastyvostey gruntiv Ukrainy.

Topographic maps of Luhansk region (scale 1:100 000) [Electronic resource]. URL http://geoknigi.com/view_map.php?id=54. Title Ukr.: Topografichni karty Luhanskoi oblasti (Ukr.).

Laktionova T.M., Medvedev V.V., Savchenko K.V., Bigun O.M., Nakisko S.G., Sheiko S.M.. 2012. Soil properties database (structure & operating procedure). Kharkiv: DT №1, 2012. 150 p. (Rus).

Belolipskyi V.O. 2012. Soil-protective landscape optimization. Tutorial. Sumy: Universytetska knyha. 399 p. (Ukr.).

Belolipskyi V.O., Poluliakh M.M. 2013. Ecology-economic optimization of crop rotations at formation of agrolandscape. Mizhvid. Tem. Nauk. Zb. “Zemlerobstvo”. Vyp. 85. Kyiv. P.89-99. (Ukr.).

Belolipskyi V.O., Usatenko Yu.I., Poluliakh M.M., Milchevska Zh.I. 2012. Influence of biohumus on resistance of chernozem southern to erosia. Visnyk agrarnoi nauky. N 12. P. 52-56. (Ukr.).

Kutsenko M.V., Timchenko D.O. 2011. On creation and dataware provision of the soil-erosion control system in Ukraine. Agrochemistry and Soil Science. Collected papers. No. 75. ISSAR. Kharkiv. P.116-120. (Ukr.).

Bulyhin S.Yu. 2005. Forming of ecological stable agrolandscapes. Kyiv: Urozhai. 298 p. (Ukr.).

Kanash O.P. 2006, on the issue of ecological-economic problems of modern agriculture. Naukovyi visnyk NAU. N 4. P. 160–164. (Ukr.).

Published

2017-12-05

How to Cite

Belolipskyi, V., Laktionova, T., & Poluliakh, M. (2017). Probabilistic nature of humus content and estimation of heterogeneity at mapping of soils on basin principle. AgroChemistry and Soil Science, 86, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.31073/acss86-03