References
1. Volokh, P. V., Levchenko, H. P., & Ostrinina, O. P. (2021). The paradigm of soil estimation and economic evaluation of agricultural land in agrarian law. Juristic scientific electronic journal, 8, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-8/38. [in Ukrainian].
2. Volkov, V. P., Pereverzeva, A. V., & Polyakova, O. I. (2020). Soil quality management in the EU and Ukraine. Efficient economy, 9. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.9.4. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/pdf/9_2020/6.pdf [in Ukrainian].
3. Chornyy, S. H. (2018). Assessment of soil quality in the leading countries of the world. Assessment of soil quality: a study guide (pp. 157-188). Mykolaiv. [in Ukrainian].
4. Mueller, L., Schindler, U., Graham, T., Ball, B., Smolentseva, E., Hu, C.,… Eulenstein F. (2012). Assessing agricultural soil quality on a global scale. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58, 576-582. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.692877.
5. Herencia, J. F., Pérez-Romero, L. F., Daza, A., & Arroyo, F. T. (2021). Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional Japanese plum orchards. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 37(2), 71-90. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2020.1842243.
6. Schloter, M., Nannipieri, P., Sørensen, S.., & Elsas, J. D. (2018). Microbial indicators for soil quality. Biology and Fertility Soils, 54, 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1248-3.
7. Zhuravel, N. E., Naydyonova, O. E., & Yaremenko, V. V. (2015). Application of biological indicators for identifying the agroecоlogical state of reclamated soils. Agrochemistry and Soil Science, 84, 80-88. Retrieved from: http://agrochemsoilsci.org/84/84-10.html. [in Ukrainian].
8. Tsyuk, O. A., Kirilyuk, V. I., & Yushchenko, L. P. (2017). Biochemical activity of typical chernozem under different farming systems. Journal of microbiology, 79(3), 65-71. doi: 10.15407/microbiolj79.03.065. [in Ukrainian].
9. Tsygichko, G. O., & Maklyuk, О. I. (2015). Dynamics of biochemical activity of chernozem typical using organic and conventional farming systems. Agrochemistry and Soil Science, 82, 91-97. Retrieved from: http://agrochemsoilsci.org/82NNN.html. [in Ukrainian].
10. Simochko, L. Yu., Demyanyuk, O. S., & Simochko, V. V. (2017). Bioindication and biotesting of soils - modern methodical approaches. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series Biology, 42, 77-81. [in Ukrainian].
11. Bulygin, S. Yu., Tonkha, O. L., Vitvitsky, S. V., Kucher, L. I., & Bulany, O. V. (2020). Evaluation and management of soil quality. Study guide. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
12. Medvedev, V. V. (2012). Soil monitoring of Ukraine. The concept. Results. Tasks. (2nd revised and supplemented edition). Kharkiv. [in Russian].
13. Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., Deyn, G., De Goede, R., ... Brussaard, L. (2018). Soil quality – a critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120, 105-125. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030.
14. Martinez, M., Gutiérrez-Romero, V., Jannsens, M., & Ortega-Blu, R. (2010). Biological soil quality indicators: a review. In: A. Mendes-Vilas (Ed.) Current Research. Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology (pp. 319-328). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285738755_Biological_soil_quality_indicators_a_review (application date 05.09.2022).
15. Huera-Lucero, T., Labrador-Moreno, J., Blanco-Salas, J., & Ruiz-Téllez, T. (2020). A Framework to incorporate biological soil quality indicators into assessing the sustainability of territories in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Sustainability, 12(7), 3007. doi: 10.3390/su12073007.
16. Blum, W. E. H. (2008). Functions of soil for society and the environment. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 4(3), 75-79. doi: 10.1007/s11157-005-2236-x.
17. Schlotera, M., Dillyb, O., & Munch, J.C. (2009). Indicators for evauating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosysems and Environment, 99, 255-265.
18. Schiefer, J., Lair, G. J., & Blum, W. E. H. (2015). Indicators for the definition of land quality as a basis for the sustainable intensification of agricultural production. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 3(1), 42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.003.
19. Bouzouidja, R., Béchet, B., Hanzlikova, J., Sněhota, M., & Jean-Soro, L. (2021). Simplified performance assessment methodology for addressing soil quality of nature-based solutions. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 21, 1909–1927. doi: 10.1007/s11368-020-02731-y.
20. Patyka, V.P. (2013). Microbiome indication of the state of chernozems of Ukraine. Materials of the international scientific and practical seminar dedicated to the 130th anniversary of the publication of the book by Professor V.V. Dokuchaev "Russian chernozem" and the emergence of agricultural research as a field of knowledge, 98. [in Ukrainian].
21. Makarova, G. A., Hlushchenko, M. K., & Vakulenko, S. I. (2003). Sideration as a factor of increasing soil fertility. Ecology: the current state of soil fertility and ways to preserve it, 68(81), 56-62. [in Ukrainian].
22. Sherstoboyeva, O. V., Shusteruk, T. Z., & Demyanyuk, O. S. (2007). Biological soil monitoring as a component of ecological monitoring of agroecosystems. Agroecological journal, 3, 45-49. [in Ukrainian].
23. Lyko, D. V., Lyko, S. M., Portuhai, O. I., & Bezverha, O. V. (2017). Cellulolytic activity of sod-podzolic soil of different biotopes. Agroecological journal, 4, 53-57. doi: 10.33730/2077-4893.4.2017.219729 [in Ukrainian].
24. Iutynska, H. O. (2006). Soil microbiology. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
25. Gamkalo, Z. (2018). Biotic activity as a criterion of edaphic comfort. In: Environmental quality of the soil. Lviv: Publishing Center of Lviv National University by Ivan Franko (pp. 200-254). [in Ukrainian].
26. Sherstoboyeva, O. V., Demyanyuk, O. C., & Chabanyuk, Y. V. (2017). Biodiagnostics and biosafety of soils of agroecosystems. Agroecological journal, 2, 142-148. doi: 10.33730/2077-4893.2.2017.220170 . [in Ukrainian].
27. Zhang, J., & Li, P. (2020). Using soil microorganism to construct a new index of soil quality evaluation. Earth Environ. Sci, 440(052023), 1-4. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/440/5/052023.
28. Qadir, M., Schubert, S., & Steffens, D. (2013). Phytotoxic Substances in Soils. In: Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment (pp. 216-222). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.05255-6.
29. Ziółkowska, A., & Wyszkowski, M. (2010). Toxicity of petroleum substances to microorganisms and plants. Ecological Chemistry and Engineerings, 17(1), 73-82.
30. Glibovytska, N., & Mykhailiuk, Yu. (2020). Phytoindication research in the system of environmental monitoring. Ecological Sciences, 1 (28), 111-114. doi: 10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.1-28.16.
31. Grossbard, E. (1952). Antibiotic production by fungi on organic manures and in soil. Journal of General Microbiology, 6 (5-4), 295-310.
32. Bansal, O. P. (2018). The influence of potentially toxic elements on soil biological and chemical properties. In Z. A. Begum, I. M. Rahman, & H. Hasegawa (Eds.), Metals in soil - contamination and remediation. London. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.81348.
33. Li, Q., Tang, J., Wang, T., Wu, D., Jiao, R., & Ren, X. (2018). Impacts of sewage irrigation on soil properties of farmland in China: A review. International Journal of Experimental Botany, 87, 40-50. doi: 10.32604/phyton.2018.87.040.
34. Berestetsky, O. A., Elisashvili, T. A., & Borovkov, A. V. (1978). The formation of phytotoxic methyl salicylic acid by some soil microorganisms and its effect on plants. Agricultural Biology, 13(6), 868-871. [in Russian].
35. Varnaite, R.N., & Raudonene, V.Z. (2003). Biodegradation of plant products by micromycetes. Mycology and phytopathology, 2, 49-52. [in Russian].
36. Gomes, I., Shaheen, M., Rahman, S. R., & Gomes, D. J. (2008). Comparative studies on production of cell wall-degrading hydrolases by Trichoderma reesei and T. Viride in submerged and solid-state cultivations. Bangladesh Journal of Microbiology, 23(2), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v23i2.882.
37. Domuschi, S. V., & Trygub, V. I. (2022). Cellulolytic activity of the soils of the city of Odesa. Bulletin of the Odesa National University named after I.I. Mechnikov. Series: Geographical and geological sciences, 27, 1(40), 61-71. doi: 10.18524/2303-9914.2022.1(40).257533. [in Ukrainian].
38. Vostrov, I. S., & Petrova, A. N. (1961). Determination of the biological activity of the soil by various methods. Microbiology, 30(4), 665-672. [in Russian].
39. Malyarchuk, R.V. (2019). Cellulolytic activity of the soils of Dubrovitsa. Modern achievements of natural sciences: materials of the All-Ukrainian student scientific and practical conference (for young scientists, students, master's students, postgraduates), 100-102. [in Ukrainian].
40. Syshchykov, D. V., Agurova, I. V.,& Syshchykova, O. V. (2021). Features of the formation of biological and cellulosolytic activity in soils of anthropogenous transformed ecosystems. Darnios aplinkos vystymas, 1(18), 99-107.
41. Кrzyśko-łupicka, T., Kręcidło, Ł., & Kręcidło, M. (2016). The comparison of cellulolytic activity of the modified soil treated with roundup. Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology, 21(1-2), 133-139.
42. Sternik, V.M. (2015). Cellulolytic activity of soils of the urban ecosystem of Rivne. Scientific foundations of conservation of biotic diversity, 6(13), 317-324. [in Ukrainian].
43. Ryan, M.G., & Law, B.E. (2005). Interpreting, measuring, and modelling soil respiration. Biogeochemistry, 73(1), 3-27.
44. Lynd, L.R., van Zyl, W.H., McBride, J.E., & Laser, M. (2005). Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16(5), 577-83. https://doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009 .
45. Novakovsky, L. Ya., Kanash, A. P., Rozumny, I. A., & Derevitsky, A. V. (1992). Methodology for appraisal of soils in Ukraine. Kyiv. [in Russian].
46. Medvedev, V. V., & Plisko, I. V. (2006). Valuation and quality assessment of arable land in Ukraine. Kharkiv. [in Russian].
47. Plisko, I. V. (2020). The quality of arable soils of Ukraine. Kharkiv. [in Ukrainian].
48. Plisko, I. V., & Strokova, D. O. (2014). Experience in soil quality assessment. Materials of the International science and practice Internet Conf. "Scientific priorities for the development of the agricultural sector in the conditions of global changes". Ternopil. [in Ukrainian].